Net Contents Without the Pain: HB‑133 for Gummies, Beverages, and Cannabis SKUs

In today’s tightly regulated market for cannabis-infused edibles, beverages, and supplements, accurate net content declaration isn’t just a regulatory detail—it’s foundational to brand trust, retail acceptance, and license protection. With the release of the 2025 edition of NIST Handbook 133 (HB-133), the standards for checking net contents have tightened, bringing new attention to how producers, QA teams, and operations managers must design their packaging lines and oversight protocols.

What is NIST HB-133 and Why Does it Matter in Cannabis, Gummies, and Beverage Packaging?

HB-133 is the national playbook for how packaging net contents are checked by regulatory inspectors—across food, supplements, and emerging industries like the cannabis sector. The 2025 update reflects not just regulatory catch-up, but real advances in how net contents (weight or volume) are calculated, including new benchmarks for:

• Sampling plans for different run sizes and formats (pouches, trays, beverages)
• Allowance for moisture loss due to storage and distribution (especially relevant for gummies, flower, and functional foods)
• Minus package errors—the difference between label claim and measured content at the unit level, which can now trigger non-compliance faster than before
• Tare and gross weight procedures that must be demonstrable, documented, and replicable by third-party inspectors

In short: If you’re not fully aligned to HB-133, your entire SKU run could be at risk of being flagged, cited, or even recalled due to inaccurate declared weights or volumes.

---

Decoding HB-133 2025 for Cannabis and Edible Producers

1. Sampling Plans:

For high-count runs (think: beverage cans, gummy pouches, pre-rolls, or 10mg edible single-serve bags), HB-133 sets out statistically valid sample sizes based on lot size. For most edible runs under 10,000 units, expect inspection samples of 5 to 24 units—each weighed and checked against both label claim and tolerance thresholds. Inspections escalate for critical failures (excessive minus errors) or patterns of underfilling.

2. Tare Weight Practices:

One of the leading causes for compliance failures is suboptimal tare determination:

• Taring empty pouches that don’t match actual in-line materials (e.g., static, humidity, batch differences)
• Not verifying tray or insert weights in automated packing
• Failing to re-tare after packaging material changes

HB-133 now requires traceable, repeatable tare setting—ideally using the same raw materials as the run being checked, and preferably on NTEP-certified scales.

3. Moisture Loss Allowances:

New for cannabis, gummies, and functional foods that could lose water in storage: The 2025 edition acknowledges that reasonable loss (up to 3% for flower, based on industry precedent, and lesser but material value for gelatins/gummies) may not be manufacturer error, provided:

• There is documentation of as-packaged weights
• QA sampling supports moisture migration risk assessment
• Final package weights still meet HB-133 minimums after loss allowance

This provision means you must combine QA at fill-time with ongoing storage checks—especially for products that may ‘dry out’ during distribution due to low humidity or oxygen transfer.

4. Minus Package Errors - What They Mean in Practice:

A “minus package error” is the shortfall by weight (or volume) below the labeled net contents. For cannabis and food, this is often measured in grams.

Example: If a 100-gram labeled pouch weighs 97g (net, after tare), and the tolerance is 1.5g for the declared size, that’s a minus package error of 3g—well above the fail threshold for most enforcement scenarios. Repeat occurrences, or outliers that violate the Maximum Allowable Variation (MAV), will result in failed lots, possible fines, and retail chargebacks.

The Role of Multihead Weighers and Checkweighers: The Compliance Backbone

To mitigate all the above, commercial producers are upgrading from manual, batch-based weighing to integrated, automated weighing systems:

• Multihead weighers use statistical combination buckets to achieve high accuracy while minimizing overfill
• Checkweighers (NTEP-certified) validate the actual weight of each finished unit, instantly rejecting underweights and flagging any drift in system performance

Why Both?

Multihead weighers optimize throughput and reduce giveaway (letting brands maintain yields), while checkweighers provide the audit trail that QA and regulators expect. Together, this dual-layer prevents average-fill logic mistakes and uncovers subtle shifts in humidity or operator error—key HB-133 pitfalls.

—

Best Practice Workflows for HB-133 Net Contents Compliance

Step 1: Develop Validated Tare SOPs

• Test all packaging batches (pouches, trays, bottles) for average and high/low tare values
• Document tare values per SKU run, and sync with your automation system
• Re-tare every time packaging material or supplier changes

Step 2: Integrate Multihead Filler and NTEP Checkweigher

• Use a system like the Paxiom Canapa Precision Weighing System (14-head filler + Pre-CheQ Analyzer) for fast, tight-tolerance weigh fills
• Ensure NTEP Certificate of Conformance for both filler and checkweigher – this is what inspectors will ask to see

Step 3: Dynamic Moisture/Weight Tracking

• For gummies/edibles: Store retain samples at various humidity levels and track weight loss over time
• For flower/extracts: Follow documented 3% moisture loss policies and update label claims if needed

Step 4: Routine QA Audits and Pre-Inspection Checks

• Simulate an HB-133 inspection using published sampling plans
• Log both average and ‘worst-case’ (minus) errors and test remediation protocols

Step 5: Immediate Response to Underfills and Overfills

• Set the filler to target slightly above the label claim but always inside the maximum
• Checkweigher rejects below-thresholds for packaging correction or discard

Avoiding Common Pitfalls in Net Contents Compliance

1. Relying on average-fill alone: Even with good averages, a handful of noncompliant packs trigger enforcement if minus errors breach the Sample Error Limit (SEL) or MAV. Always check individual units—not just batch averages.

2. Ignoring humidity-driven weight loss: Especially in arid climates or with permeable pouches, product can lose measurable weight. Build this into your fill spec, and make ongoing checks part of your routine—before the inspector does.

3. Mis-taring in high-count, variable packaging: Don’t trust supplier-provided tare weights. Document and test with the actual packaging.

What Does an NTEP-Certified Weighing System Cost?

• New Systems: Full-featured multihead weighers + checkweighers (NTEP-certified) range from $65,000 to $130,000+ installed, depending on automation level and line speed.
• Refurbished Equipment: Quality refurbished systems—like those found here—often run $60,000 to $90,000 with immediate availability and service support, and bring the same compliance credibility.

While this may seem like a high up-front cost, the payback for avoiding recalls, chargebacks, and lost market access (especially as spot checks increase) is dramatic—often under 12 months for mid-size producers.

Enforcement Trends and Real-World Case Studies

As regulations in cannabis-adjacent CPGs align more closely with food industry standards, enforcement trends show:

• Simultaneous inspection of multiple SKUs with on-the-spot tare challenges
• Failure rates increasing for brands not proactively tracking humidity-driven weight loss
• Quantifiable ROI for operators who switch from manual/random checks to automated, dual-layer NTEP-certified weighing

Brands adopting these best practices report:

• Zero instances of failed random inspection in over 18 months (across multiple states)
• Dramatic reduction in product giveaway, increasing gross margin by 2-4%
• Ability to confidently scale new SKUs (hard candies, functional gummies, beverages) without changing their QA program

---

Partner With the Experts—Urth & Fyre Support

Urth & Fyre offers not only NTEP-certified Precision Weighing Systems for direct procurement, but also full setup audits, SOP training, and compliance support. Let our experts help harmonize your QA and operations teams so your SKUs are inspection-proof.

Ready to take the pain out of HB‑133 net contents compliance? Browse the latest weighing solutions and request a workflow audit at urthandfyre.com today.

---

Additional Resources

• NIST Handbook 133, 2025 Edition (Official PDF)
• NTEP Certification and National Conference on Weights & Measures
• NIST Guidance for the Cannabis Trade (2025)