Latest Posts
Solvent recovery is often the largest energy sink in small extraction facilities. This post explains how to size rotovap systems, optimize bath/chiller/setpoints, compare batching vs semi‑continuous workflows, and deploy heat‑recovery and demand‑management strategies to cut kWh per liter and peak charges. Includes an actionable IQ/OQ and used‑equipment energy check checklist and a recommended rotovap + chiller pairing from Urth & Fyre.
A practical, risk‑based framework for lab operators and managers to triage inventory across −86°C, −20°C, and 2–8°C storage bands. Covers material categorization, stability guidance, energy and ROI comparisons, commissioning and preventive maintenance, alarm and backup strategies, and a step‑by‑step implementation plan to avoid unnecessary ULT purchases.
Many operators treat circulators as commodity items. This post reframes high‑performance circulators as strategic assets — showing how <strong>precision thermal control</strong> directly impacts decarboxylation kinetics, crystallization outcomes, and confection quality. Includes selection guidance, fluid and pump considerations, verification tests, preventive maintenance, ROI benchmarks, and a recommended Urth & Fyre listing (sl-12-300degc-12l-heating-circulators).
Operators scaling past a single wiped‑film still face a strategic choice: install a second wiped‑film stage (dual WFE), enlarge the primary column, or add a short‑path polishing finisher. This article gives a decision framework based on throughput, product mix, QA constraints, vacuum/thermal demands, cleanliness and CIP, simple 3–5 year TCO models, and practical timelines so teams can pick the right path without vendor marketing noise.
Many operations buy HPLC systems to meet regulatory COA requirements but miss their biggest value: real‑time process control. This guide shows extraction and manufacturing teams how to build sampling plans, choose quick‑turn vs full‑resolution methods, create simple KPIs and dashboards, and run a defensible calibration program that makes in‑house potency data actionable on the floor.
Most vape lines treat filling, capping, and net-contents checks as separate islands. This post shows how to connect them into a closed-loop QA system—linking fillers, press cappers, and NTEP/EMFR weighing—to reduce scrap, document compliance to NIST HB-44/HB-133 practices, and build audit-ready net‑contents records.


